CCC
04-11 01:59 PM
Understood.
wallpaper Makeup looks page megan image
lghtslpr
02-13 04:40 PM
Personalised emails will add lot off value, sending mass faxes would create more business for Fellowes in selling more shredder. I woud request u to think again before you guys spam the offices
I've been told by senators' aids that letters, faxes and email all have an impact. Politicians do not read them all, of course, but their aids summarize volume and content for them. I was told specifically that written letters carry more weight than emails, because they represent greater effort by the sender.
-L.
I've been told by senators' aids that letters, faxes and email all have an impact. Politicians do not read them all, of course, but their aids summarize volume and content for them. I was told specifically that written letters carry more weight than emails, because they represent greater effort by the sender.
-L.
godbless
07-18 09:08 PM
Thanks for great services..
My situation is as under : " My case is in removal proceedings for violating H1b status for 3 months due to laid off situation, i am working on H1b now and my labor is approved and I-140 is pending, now my priority date is become current for I-485 filing", now who will adjudicate my case, INS or EOIR court, where will i file my I-485.
will court close my removal proceedings based on PD current..
i will really really apprecate your help.
As yours is a really serious matter. You should take the advice of some attorney in fact as time available to know about the whole thing and then applying for I 485, in case, is very less.
My situation is as under : " My case is in removal proceedings for violating H1b status for 3 months due to laid off situation, i am working on H1b now and my labor is approved and I-140 is pending, now my priority date is become current for I-485 filing", now who will adjudicate my case, INS or EOIR court, where will i file my I-485.
will court close my removal proceedings based on PD current..
i will really really apprecate your help.
As yours is a really serious matter. You should take the advice of some attorney in fact as time available to know about the whole thing and then applying for I 485, in case, is very less.
2011 megan fox without makeup on.
vrbest
01-21 09:04 PM
Thanks "LostInGCProcess". This clarifies my doubt..Ksrk: One of my friend had asked his lawyer and they said we can be on H1B even if we used AP..
Yes, you get I-94 with 1 year and states AOS Pending...Basically, means, you are allowed to stay till the outcome of your I-485.
Yes, as long as you are working for the same employer. I did the same, I am on H1 right now, but used my AP last year to travel to India.
Yes, you get I-94 with 1 year and states AOS Pending...Basically, means, you are allowed to stay till the outcome of your I-485.
Yes, as long as you are working for the same employer. I did the same, I am on H1 right now, but used my AP last year to travel to India.
more...
english_august
07-18 12:27 AM
It's a free country and everyone, including Lou Dobbs have a right to voice their opinion - boycotts will not serve any purpose.
If you feel so passionately about it, here's what I suggest. Create a blog/website and every single day after his program, post an article pointing out factual inaccuracies in Lou's reports and views. If you don't want to watch the program, then CNN publishes a transcript a couple of hours later - follow that.
It's hard work but believe me - do it consistently and do it well and you will see that it will work.
Best of luck and post the address of your site/blog here should you decide to do it.
If you feel so passionately about it, here's what I suggest. Create a blog/website and every single day after his program, post an article pointing out factual inaccuracies in Lou's reports and views. If you don't want to watch the program, then CNN publishes a transcript a couple of hours later - follow that.
It's hard work but believe me - do it consistently and do it well and you will see that it will work.
Best of luck and post the address of your site/blog here should you decide to do it.
pappu
06-07 01:40 PM
can't make it to DC, made a contribution.
Transaction ID: 94R50453J99520901
Good Luck !!!
Thanks
Transaction ID: 94R50453J99520901
Good Luck !!!
Thanks
more...
Hong12
12-16 01:51 AM
Thanks so much for a quick response. My cover letter, I-129, I-797 and LCA are correct. However, the petition letter from my employer to USCIS has all the wrong background. In this case, does it mean that my lawyer can just send me the new petition letter with the correct information? I can then bring the new petition letter to the consular? I also found the following info:
USCIS send information on all approved petitions requiring visa issuance to the Kentucky Consular Center (KCC). KCC then scans and enters all pertinent information including Form I-129, employer support letter (Petition Letter), and beneficiary's identification documents into PIMS. The U.S. consular will then confirm a petition in PIMS before the issuance of the visa.
Also, I just talked to my lawyer again, and he told me that I�m overreacting about the whole issue! He kept saying that this is not a big deal at all for having the wrong background on the petition letter submitted to USCIS. He said that the new petition letter, I-129 and documents do not need to be resubmitted to USCIS. My lawyer also said that he can simply solve the problem by sending me the new petition letter. Accordingly, I can then bring this new letter to the consular for the visa interview instead of going through the resubmission. He also said that there is nothing to be worry about PIMS or anything.
In this case, would it be ok? I thought that the consular can pull the copy of the petition letter from PIMS. Would it be alright if the petition letter they have on PIMS is different from the new petition letter that I will bring to the Consular? Please advise. Thank you very much.
USCIS send information on all approved petitions requiring visa issuance to the Kentucky Consular Center (KCC). KCC then scans and enters all pertinent information including Form I-129, employer support letter (Petition Letter), and beneficiary's identification documents into PIMS. The U.S. consular will then confirm a petition in PIMS before the issuance of the visa.
Also, I just talked to my lawyer again, and he told me that I�m overreacting about the whole issue! He kept saying that this is not a big deal at all for having the wrong background on the petition letter submitted to USCIS. He said that the new petition letter, I-129 and documents do not need to be resubmitted to USCIS. My lawyer also said that he can simply solve the problem by sending me the new petition letter. Accordingly, I can then bring this new letter to the consular for the visa interview instead of going through the resubmission. He also said that there is nothing to be worry about PIMS or anything.
In this case, would it be ok? I thought that the consular can pull the copy of the petition letter from PIMS. Would it be alright if the petition letter they have on PIMS is different from the new petition letter that I will bring to the Consular? Please advise. Thank you very much.
2010 Megan Fox:
sudhirdd
07-11 02:48 PM
I am seriouly looking out for a job as currently on bench from last one month and my employer doesn't pay the bench salary. Currently I am on EAD with my GC sponsering employer. I would appreciate if any of you pls. reply this post. My question is,
If I joined a new employer using EAD-AC21 (as 11 month passed of my I-485) which is very small employer (currently have about 35 employees only), would it cause a problem in my GC process approval? I mean, do you think USCIS may create any RFC as I have join the very small employer, may ask any financial document to declare? Can you pls. tell me what are the potential problems my come in this situation?
Pls. help, your reply will be highly appreciable?
If I joined a new employer using EAD-AC21 (as 11 month passed of my I-485) which is very small employer (currently have about 35 employees only), would it cause a problem in my GC process approval? I mean, do you think USCIS may create any RFC as I have join the very small employer, may ask any financial document to declare? Can you pls. tell me what are the potential problems my come in this situation?
Pls. help, your reply will be highly appreciable?
more...
walking_dude
01-28 07:22 PM
Your situation is exactly like mine. Got OCI for first kid and PIO for the second.
Yes, rules have changed now. They denied OCI application submitted by a friend of mine (for his daughter). PIO is the only available choice.
This question is specific to Indian nationals with children born in US.
Has anyone on H1 or pending 485 received OCI for their US born child? We were able to get OCI for our first child a few years ago but the rules seem to have changed and cgisf.org states that a child whose both parents are Indian citizens can't get OCI. Any ideas? Is PIO the right option now?
Yes, rules have changed now. They denied OCI application submitted by a friend of mine (for his daughter). PIO is the only available choice.
This question is specific to Indian nationals with children born in US.
Has anyone on H1 or pending 485 received OCI for their US born child? We were able to get OCI for our first child a few years ago but the rules seem to have changed and cgisf.org states that a child whose both parents are Indian citizens can't get OCI. Any ideas? Is PIO the right option now?
hair eye shadow but Megan Fox
humsuplou
11-30 02:50 AM
Btw, regarding the letter from the hospital, is an scanned copy sent from email good enough? Or do I need original copy?
Thanks again!
Thanks again!
more...
gcisadawg
09-25 02:45 PM
http://www.reason.com/images/07cf533ddb1d06350cf1ddb5942ef5ad.jpg
Enjoy
The slide is very informative and catchy. But the title could have been better. I thought of sending this to my colleagues at work. But the title
"What part of legal immigration don't you understand?" stopped me.
It could have been "Legal immigration 101" or something to that effect.
Enjoy
The slide is very informative and catchy. But the title could have been better. I thought of sending this to my colleagues at work. But the title
"What part of legal immigration don't you understand?" stopped me.
It could have been "Legal immigration 101" or something to that effect.
hot MAC Bronze eye shadow
vsrinir
09-16 02:43 PM
I DONT SEE ANY PROBLEMS, AS LONG AS YOU KEEP YOUR AP, LETTER FROM YOUR EMPLOYER AND LAST 3 PAY STUBS AND COPY OF I485,EAD,AC21 COPY IF YOU HAVE ONE
Hello Gurus,
I am July 2nd filer like so many others. I have changed employer after 9 month of filing I-485. I-140 was approved in Jun 2007. I have AP approved.
My question : Is it advisable to travel to India and come back on AP? the reason I am asking is I have changed the employer? Will that affect my entry back to USA in any way at immigration check? Please advise.
Thanks in advance.
--Srinivas
Hello Gurus,
I am July 2nd filer like so many others. I have changed employer after 9 month of filing I-485. I-140 was approved in Jun 2007. I have AP approved.
My question : Is it advisable to travel to India and come back on AP? the reason I am asking is I have changed the employer? Will that affect my entry back to USA in any way at immigration check? Please advise.
Thanks in advance.
--Srinivas
more...
house Transformers hottie Megan Fox
shyamiv
08-13 11:45 AM
USA which is a so called developed country, takes 6 months to issue a passport due to the fact that USCIS is over...........loaded with work. So Flashing story is an old one and will only fit in Hollywood world.
The US Department of State Bureau of Consular Affairs issues a US passport to eligible citizens. Applying for passport and issuance is not a USCIS affair and hence is a lot faster i would say a month or less at most ! Had it been a USCIS affair.... most americans will still be tracking their passport case status online ! :)
The US Department of State Bureau of Consular Affairs issues a US passport to eligible citizens. Applying for passport and issuance is not a USCIS affair and hence is a lot faster i would say a month or less at most ! Had it been a USCIS affair.... most americans will still be tracking their passport case status online ! :)
tattoo Witness Megan Fox, who showed
feedfront
09-15 05:39 PM
Yes I got RFE like 1 month back about employment verification...
As 'sanju_dba' said, you should celebrate your freedom here as we appreciate this freedom more than anybody.
Congrats again and enjoy!!!!
As 'sanju_dba' said, you should celebrate your freedom here as we appreciate this freedom more than anybody.
Congrats again and enjoy!!!!
more...
pictures Megan Fox showed up with Shia
transpass
07-30 12:37 AM
This particular EB1 gc aspirant has been waiting for his gc even after 2-3 years of his PD becoming current. He don't want EB1 applications to be subjected to the processing times set for EB2/EB3 etc.
His point is, it does not make sense to wait 2-3 years for a GC once his date is current.
I don't think that was what he was implying. He was saying EB1s are lumped with other categories for adjudication purposes. I don't think that's the way CIS handles EB1. If he had waited for 2-3 yrs., his case might be an outlier, but I know several people with EB1 have gotten their GCs within few months of filing...Moreover, it does not have several steps like labor, etc. and it's anyway shorter time frame than other categories, and it's pretty much current all the time...
His point is, it does not make sense to wait 2-3 years for a GC once his date is current.
I don't think that was what he was implying. He was saying EB1s are lumped with other categories for adjudication purposes. I don't think that's the way CIS handles EB1. If he had waited for 2-3 yrs., his case might be an outlier, but I know several people with EB1 have gotten their GCs within few months of filing...Moreover, it does not have several steps like labor, etc. and it's anyway shorter time frame than other categories, and it's pretty much current all the time...
dresses of Megan Fox#39;s makeup,
Blog Feeds
09-18 10:20 AM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgoNojtZktPY9jokt3qjtRAzqENXTwMywgAkUCtZuWKLkx42vPM7Td6jb2x_R__GUC3KEGvs42kqSOgMHyvCMFst2ckH09p7YtJf6_-Qr6sVGbqfM5_pG06tTr4m5nyBfJmAAjF4YEIEAY/s320/Wilson+Liar.jpg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgoNojtZktPY9jokt3qjtRAzqENXTwMywgAkUCtZuWKLkx42vPM7Td6jb2x_R__GUC3KEGvs42kqSOgMHyvCMFst2ckH09p7YtJf6_-Qr6sVGbqfM5_pG06tTr4m5nyBfJmAAjF4YEIEAY/s1600-h/Wilson+Liar.jpg)During President Obama's address to a joint session of Congress on Tuesday, Congressman Joe Wilson (R. SC), shouted "LIAR!" when President Obama stated that the proposed health care plan would not cover "illegal aliens." Now, Joe Wilson said he should know this because he once was an immigration lawyer (http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2009/09/rep-joe-wilson-speaks-to-rwv.html). Whether that meant immigration from or to South Carolina, I am not sure, but one thing is for sure, no one I know ever knew Joe Wilson the immigration lawyer. If by "immigration lawyer" Mr. Wilson meant that he once helped an immigrant get deported, I am not sure that really counts. But if "Joe the Immigration Lawyer" is like "Joe the Plumber," then maybe he thinks he really was one.
After all, an immigration lawyer would likely be able to understand what exactly the law means when it says that only citizens and permanent residents are covered under the Obama plan. What has caused Joe Wilson to react like this, besides a serious lack of self control, is the provision in the proposed legislation that eliminates the requirement of using the "SAVE" system to verify whether someone who is an immigrant, is legally in the United States. Use of this program has stopped very few undocumented immigrants from getting public benefits, but has stopped literally thousands of U.S. citizens, mostly poor, from obtaining benefits because of their lack of accessible proof of their citizenship.
Factcheck.org has presented a short article on Seven Falsehoods About Health Care (http://www.factcheck.org/2009/08/seven-falsehoods-about-health-care/). One of those applies directly to this point:
False: Illegal Immigrants Will Be Covered. One Republican congressman issued
a press release claiming that "5,600,000 Illegal Aliens May Be Covered Under Obamacare (http://steveking.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Newsroom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=a294b300-19b9-b4b1-1296-659af869849a&Region_id=&Issue_id=)," and we�ve been peppered with queries about similar claims. They�re not true. In fact, the House bill (the only bill to be formally introduced in its entirety) specifically says that no federal money would be spent on giving illegal immigrants health coverage:
H.R. 3200: Sec 246 � NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS. Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States.
Also, under current law, those in the country illegally don�t qualify for federal health programs. Of interest: About half of illegal immigrants have health insurance now, according to the nonpartisan Pew Hispanic Center, which says those who lack insurance do so principally because their employers don�t offer it."Misleading GOP Health Care Claims" (http://factcheck.org/2009/07/misleading-gop-health-care-claims/) July 23 � by Brooks Jackson, Viveca Novak, Lori Robertson and Jess Henig.
I can certainly see both sides of the debate, and, frankly, neither side is being completely honest or clear. What is quite clear, is how immigration, and our broken immigration system, keeps coming up in the context of the debate of national agenda items, such as the health care debate.
Several weeks ago I blogged on the danger that the tone of the Health care debate (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/08/healthcare-debate-and-immigration.html)had for the coming immigration reform debate. Calling the President a Liar during his speech to a joint session to Congress is Exhibit A in what we have in store for the coming debate. If Joe Wilson the Immigration Lawyer can misrepresent the consequences of legislative language as straight forward as these two particular sections, we have to be prepared for the extraordinary misrepresentations of any positive aspects of an immigration reform bill. Whether it is "amnesty," "rewarding law breakers," "open borders," "Liars," or even "destroyers of American culture" we have to understand how to phrase and present the response. Without a doubt, the response from those of us who understand the need to balance immigration reform, with security concerns, and with economic growth has to be not only vocal, but focused. We, as Real Immigration Lawyers, must know the language of the proposed legislation, we must know the myths that are out there, and we need to be vocal in our response.
Next week, more than 40 talk radio hosts are descending on Capital Hill for the FAIR (http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=846)Annual Scare the Crap Out of Congress Boondoggle. The outrageous claims of the downfall of America caused by illegal immigration, along with similarly nutty myths will be presented as facts. Actual real news organization will cite the Center for Immigration Studies as a legitimate source of information. We must be prepared to call into our local radio stations, whose hosts are in D.C. next week, and be prepared to present the facts of immigration. Not by sugar coating the problems that are caused by illegal immigration, but rather by pointing out which specific laws are broken (INA 212(a)(9) anyone?) and how having a comprehensive solution can actually fix the immigration pothole in the legislative superhighway. Immigration Lawyers it is time to Stand Up and be vocal and beat back the immigration myths (http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?bc=27924).
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-8070452709764975137?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/09/liar-what-does-health-care-have-to-do.html)
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgoNojtZktPY9jokt3qjtRAzqENXTwMywgAkUCtZuWKLkx42vPM7Td6jb2x_R__GUC3KEGvs42kqSOgMHyvCMFst2ckH09p7YtJf6_-Qr6sVGbqfM5_pG06tTr4m5nyBfJmAAjF4YEIEAY/s320/Wilson+Liar.jpg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgoNojtZktPY9jokt3qjtRAzqENXTwMywgAkUCtZuWKLkx42vPM7Td6jb2x_R__GUC3KEGvs42kqSOgMHyvCMFst2ckH09p7YtJf6_-Qr6sVGbqfM5_pG06tTr4m5nyBfJmAAjF4YEIEAY/s1600-h/Wilson+Liar.jpg)During President Obama's address to a joint session of Congress on Tuesday, Congressman Joe Wilson (R. SC), shouted "LIAR!" when President Obama stated that the proposed health care plan would not cover "illegal aliens." Now, Joe Wilson said he should know this because he once was an immigration lawyer (http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2009/09/rep-joe-wilson-speaks-to-rwv.html). Whether that meant immigration from or to South Carolina, I am not sure, but one thing is for sure, no one I know ever knew Joe Wilson the immigration lawyer. If by "immigration lawyer" Mr. Wilson meant that he once helped an immigrant get deported, I am not sure that really counts. But if "Joe the Immigration Lawyer" is like "Joe the Plumber," then maybe he thinks he really was one.
After all, an immigration lawyer would likely be able to understand what exactly the law means when it says that only citizens and permanent residents are covered under the Obama plan. What has caused Joe Wilson to react like this, besides a serious lack of self control, is the provision in the proposed legislation that eliminates the requirement of using the "SAVE" system to verify whether someone who is an immigrant, is legally in the United States. Use of this program has stopped very few undocumented immigrants from getting public benefits, but has stopped literally thousands of U.S. citizens, mostly poor, from obtaining benefits because of their lack of accessible proof of their citizenship.
Factcheck.org has presented a short article on Seven Falsehoods About Health Care (http://www.factcheck.org/2009/08/seven-falsehoods-about-health-care/). One of those applies directly to this point:
False: Illegal Immigrants Will Be Covered. One Republican congressman issued
a press release claiming that "5,600,000 Illegal Aliens May Be Covered Under Obamacare (http://steveking.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Newsroom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=a294b300-19b9-b4b1-1296-659af869849a&Region_id=&Issue_id=)," and we�ve been peppered with queries about similar claims. They�re not true. In fact, the House bill (the only bill to be formally introduced in its entirety) specifically says that no federal money would be spent on giving illegal immigrants health coverage:
H.R. 3200: Sec 246 � NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS. Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States.
Also, under current law, those in the country illegally don�t qualify for federal health programs. Of interest: About half of illegal immigrants have health insurance now, according to the nonpartisan Pew Hispanic Center, which says those who lack insurance do so principally because their employers don�t offer it."Misleading GOP Health Care Claims" (http://factcheck.org/2009/07/misleading-gop-health-care-claims/) July 23 � by Brooks Jackson, Viveca Novak, Lori Robertson and Jess Henig.
I can certainly see both sides of the debate, and, frankly, neither side is being completely honest or clear. What is quite clear, is how immigration, and our broken immigration system, keeps coming up in the context of the debate of national agenda items, such as the health care debate.
Several weeks ago I blogged on the danger that the tone of the Health care debate (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/08/healthcare-debate-and-immigration.html)had for the coming immigration reform debate. Calling the President a Liar during his speech to a joint session to Congress is Exhibit A in what we have in store for the coming debate. If Joe Wilson the Immigration Lawyer can misrepresent the consequences of legislative language as straight forward as these two particular sections, we have to be prepared for the extraordinary misrepresentations of any positive aspects of an immigration reform bill. Whether it is "amnesty," "rewarding law breakers," "open borders," "Liars," or even "destroyers of American culture" we have to understand how to phrase and present the response. Without a doubt, the response from those of us who understand the need to balance immigration reform, with security concerns, and with economic growth has to be not only vocal, but focused. We, as Real Immigration Lawyers, must know the language of the proposed legislation, we must know the myths that are out there, and we need to be vocal in our response.
Next week, more than 40 talk radio hosts are descending on Capital Hill for the FAIR (http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=846)Annual Scare the Crap Out of Congress Boondoggle. The outrageous claims of the downfall of America caused by illegal immigration, along with similarly nutty myths will be presented as facts. Actual real news organization will cite the Center for Immigration Studies as a legitimate source of information. We must be prepared to call into our local radio stations, whose hosts are in D.C. next week, and be prepared to present the facts of immigration. Not by sugar coating the problems that are caused by illegal immigration, but rather by pointing out which specific laws are broken (INA 212(a)(9) anyone?) and how having a comprehensive solution can actually fix the immigration pothole in the legislative superhighway. Immigration Lawyers it is time to Stand Up and be vocal and beat back the immigration myths (http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?bc=27924).
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-8070452709764975137?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/09/liar-what-does-health-care-have-to-do.html)
more...
makeup megan fox eye makeup
Ingerried
04-14 04:12 PM
�������, ��������, ���������� �������� ����� ������. ����� ����� �������
�� ����� ��������, ������� ���������� ���������� ����� �������� �� �����
����� "����� �� ����� ����� ����������".
XVI �������� ���������� ��� �������, �� ������� ���� ���������� ��������
�������� �� �� ����� ��� ������� �����������. ����� ����, ������� ���
����������� ������������ �� ������ (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/article.php?article=320108)
��� ����� ����������� � ���������� (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/article.php?article=29921)
����������� ����� ���������� � ������� (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/article.php?article=250001)
����������� �� � ����������� (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/ctg.php?category=15&page=3)
����� ����� ������ ����� ����������� (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/article.php?article=654888)
�������� ��������� ���� ����������� (http://exafarev.comyr.com/article.php?article=468460)
����� ����������� � �������� (http://exafarev.comyr.com/article.php?article=585977)
������ ����������� ����� online (http://exafarev.comyr.com/article.php?article=824957)
���� ���������� ������ ����������� (http://exafarev.comyr.com/ctg.php?category=2&page=2)
����������� � ����� ����������� (http://exafarev.comyr.com/article.php?article=557287)
����������� ������������ ����� ����������� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=40265)
����������� ����� � ����������� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=782255)
����������� ������ ��������� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=44505)
������� ����� ����������� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=845985)
����������� ������ ���� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=717388)
���������� ������� ����������� � ������ (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=785423)
����� ����������� � ���������� (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=419816)
������ ����������� � ������ (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=495782)
����������� � 12 ������ ����� (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=987036)
�������� ������� �������� ����������� ������ (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=528981)
����������� ���������� ������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=988528)
����������� ������������ ��������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=972994)
������ ����������� � ���������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=278785)
����� ��������� ����������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=753056)
���� ����������� ������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=448608)
����� ������ ����������� ������������ (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=252739)
����������� ����� ����� (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=461696)
������ ����������� � � ��������� (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=587425)
����������� ��� �������� (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=355986)
����������� � ������ �������� (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=691482)
���� ����������� ������ ��� (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=57653)
����������� � ������������ �������� (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=282445)
������� ����������� ����������� (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=524884)
������ ����������� ������ (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=539670)
������� ������� ����������� ������ (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=322688)
������� ������ ����������� ������ (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=950943)
����������� ���������� ��� (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=487069)
����������� �� ������ � �������� (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=297234)
����������� � ������� ������ (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=568173)
����� ����������� �� ������ (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=148147)
������������ ����� ����� ����������� ������������� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=101200)
���� ����� ����������� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=566787)
����������� �� ��� 2000� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=695888)
����������� ������ �� 1500 ��� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=800535)
����������� � ��������� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=300464)
�� ����� ��������, ������� ���������� ���������� ����� �������� �� �����
����� "����� �� ����� ����� ����������".
XVI �������� ���������� ��� �������, �� ������� ���� ���������� ��������
�������� �� �� ����� ��� ������� �����������. ����� ����, ������� ���
����������� ������������ �� ������ (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/article.php?article=320108)
��� ����� ����������� � ���������� (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/article.php?article=29921)
����������� ����� ���������� � ������� (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/article.php?article=250001)
����������� �� � ����������� (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/ctg.php?category=15&page=3)
����� ����� ������ ����� ����������� (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/article.php?article=654888)
�������� ��������� ���� ����������� (http://exafarev.comyr.com/article.php?article=468460)
����� ����������� � �������� (http://exafarev.comyr.com/article.php?article=585977)
������ ����������� ����� online (http://exafarev.comyr.com/article.php?article=824957)
���� ���������� ������ ����������� (http://exafarev.comyr.com/ctg.php?category=2&page=2)
����������� � ����� ����������� (http://exafarev.comyr.com/article.php?article=557287)
����������� ������������ ����� ����������� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=40265)
����������� ����� � ����������� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=782255)
����������� ������ ��������� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=44505)
������� ����� ����������� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=845985)
����������� ������ ���� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=717388)
���������� ������� ����������� � ������ (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=785423)
����� ����������� � ���������� (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=419816)
������ ����������� � ������ (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=495782)
����������� � 12 ������ ����� (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=987036)
�������� ������� �������� ����������� ������ (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=528981)
����������� ���������� ������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=988528)
����������� ������������ ��������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=972994)
������ ����������� � ���������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=278785)
����� ��������� ����������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=753056)
���� ����������� ������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=448608)
����� ������ ����������� ������������ (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=252739)
����������� ����� ����� (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=461696)
������ ����������� � � ��������� (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=587425)
����������� ��� �������� (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=355986)
����������� � ������ �������� (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=691482)
���� ����������� ������ ��� (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=57653)
����������� � ������������ �������� (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=282445)
������� ����������� ����������� (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=524884)
������ ����������� ������ (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=539670)
������� ������� ����������� ������ (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=322688)
������� ������ ����������� ������ (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=950943)
����������� ���������� ��� (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=487069)
����������� �� ������ � �������� (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=297234)
����������� � ������� ������ (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=568173)
����� ����������� �� ������ (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=148147)
������������ ����� ����� ����������� ������������� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=101200)
���� ����� ����������� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=566787)
����������� �� ��� 2000� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=695888)
����������� ������ �� 1500 ��� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=800535)
����������� � ��������� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=300464)
girlfriend Asia celebrities
yabadaba
06-26 01:28 PM
once again^^^
hairstyles of Megan Fox back in 2004.
xbohdpukc
09-25 02:45 PM
If this is derivative, then how come H1 obtained should be counted towards H4. H1 is standalone and should not be counted.
Again, my wife is on H4 for 6 years and I did not get into 485 stage. Now she wants to go to India and come back after a one year break. If she comes back after a year on new H1, it would be fine for her. If she come back on H4, can she get a H1 after one year?
Any idea, whether this is possible?
Ur missing the point.
The number after the letter, which stands for the classification category is pretty much irrelevant for the purpose of determining the maximum period of stay. You might notice that in many publications USCIS addresses visitors to the US as being in B, H or L status, omitting the #.
As long as your wife maintains her H4 status properly (providing you maintain your H1 status) and as long as she possess necessary travel documents she is free to enter and exit the country.
As far as I understand she will not have any legal problem obtaining an H1 visa after staying out of the country for a year, as long as the visa # is available, she has a job offer etc.
But I do not believe that her H status clock will reset if she leaves the country for a year, then enter in H4 status (which is still a derivative and tied to your principal H status clock). Therefore she will not be able to change her status to that of H1.
Again, it's a pretty complicated matter and you might want to consult an experienced lawyer.
Again, my wife is on H4 for 6 years and I did not get into 485 stage. Now she wants to go to India and come back after a one year break. If she comes back after a year on new H1, it would be fine for her. If she come back on H4, can she get a H1 after one year?
Any idea, whether this is possible?
Ur missing the point.
The number after the letter, which stands for the classification category is pretty much irrelevant for the purpose of determining the maximum period of stay. You might notice that in many publications USCIS addresses visitors to the US as being in B, H or L status, omitting the #.
As long as your wife maintains her H4 status properly (providing you maintain your H1 status) and as long as she possess necessary travel documents she is free to enter and exit the country.
As far as I understand she will not have any legal problem obtaining an H1 visa after staying out of the country for a year, as long as the visa # is available, she has a job offer etc.
But I do not believe that her H status clock will reset if she leaves the country for a year, then enter in H4 status (which is still a derivative and tied to your principal H status clock). Therefore she will not be able to change her status to that of H1.
Again, it's a pretty complicated matter and you might want to consult an experienced lawyer.
prdgl
02-11 11:08 AM
But quality of life is determined by the freedom and once you get your GC then you will be able to do anything, right ? or I am thinking wrong.
If I did that, my EB2 category is current, my EB3 category is retrogressed - but I value my job and quality of life at my current company higher than the risk of moving to another job JUST to get a greencard quicker
Also, are you talking about the risk involved in changing jobs because of H1B transfer process. Because I am a contractor and all consulting companies are MORE or LESS the same. They all try to make money out of you. So I am trying to understand what kind of risk is that.
Your thoghts are important. Please let me know.
Thanks
If I did that, my EB2 category is current, my EB3 category is retrogressed - but I value my job and quality of life at my current company higher than the risk of moving to another job JUST to get a greencard quicker
Also, are you talking about the risk involved in changing jobs because of H1B transfer process. Because I am a contractor and all consulting companies are MORE or LESS the same. They all try to make money out of you. So I am trying to understand what kind of risk is that.
Your thoghts are important. Please let me know.
Thanks
sts_seeker
05-14 06:30 PM
I AM ALSO victim of same situation. I got my RFE and replied already but wife's RFE hasn't been received and its been more than 3 weeks. My atty called, sent letters and I also called but no letter yet. Don't know why this same pattern happening?
No comments:
Post a Comment