dixie
03-13 11:44 PM
There are two sides to the issue : strengthening the domestic workforce through education, research investment etc and then there is skilled immigration. The first half no doubt enjoys unanimous support ... however, when it comes to promoting skilled immigration, it is a pretty safe bet that the anti-immigrant lobby is going to play hard ball (already evident from the SF gate article). Overcoming this lobby is the whole challenge ..
wallpaper house hair Gaga Judas Album
Dhundhun
04-24 02:54 PM
I got one more LUD for I-485
ie., I got One on Mar 18th and the othe LUD on Mar 25. What dows this mean.
Can somebody clarify...
It seems that whenever they open file a LUD is generated, e.g.
..FP done
..FP Oked
..I sent docs for e-filed EAD, when they received they put a LUD
Soft LUD is happening amounts to some activity happening with file/case.
ie., I got One on Mar 18th and the othe LUD on Mar 25. What dows this mean.
Can somebody clarify...
It seems that whenever they open file a LUD is generated, e.g.
..FP done
..FP Oked
..I sent docs for e-filed EAD, when they received they put a LUD
Soft LUD is happening amounts to some activity happening with file/case.
mallu
10-14 02:28 PM
It is mentioned by many that PD should be current at the time of GC approval. Is that right?
I know people from India who got their GC approved when their PD is not current.
One can check this easily in looking for I-485 approvals to people from India who submitted their applications concurrently in EB2 category after say april 2004. Disregard the cases which got approved in July 2007. Still there are many cases remaining invalidating the 'rule'!
The strict rule is that one's PD needs to be current for approval. But if there aren't earlier PDs available for approval ( say stuck in namecheck ) and if USCIS doesn't want to visa numbers for a year to be wasted , then one can get approved even if PD is not current.
I know people from India who got their GC approved when their PD is not current.
One can check this easily in looking for I-485 approvals to people from India who submitted their applications concurrently in EB2 category after say april 2004. Disregard the cases which got approved in July 2007. Still there are many cases remaining invalidating the 'rule'!
The strict rule is that one's PD needs to be current for approval. But if there aren't earlier PDs available for approval ( say stuck in namecheck ) and if USCIS doesn't want to visa numbers for a year to be wasted , then one can get approved even if PD is not current.
2011 We write a lot about Gaga here
Karen
November 13th, 2006, 02:04 PM
Thank you for the reply. There was another thread that touched on this and it sounded like they were able to replace the button battery. It's not something that I would feel comfortable doing tho'!