bksjay
01-26 05:08 AM
can someone pls help me with a few question on re entry permit. i will be going back to us after 1year 8months. i had applied for re entry perit in oct 2007 - i left us in may 2008 - my re entry permit is valid till july 2010. i will be going to us in feb 2010. my question is will i have problem because i left us before i got my permit. my husband who was still in us got my permit for me.
wallpaper Cori Rist, the Hooters
CantLeaveAmerica
04-09 01:08 PM
I dont think it is mandatory..please look at this:
Employmentbased
Criteria
The adjudicating officer must determine whether the employment-based
I-485 meets waiver of interview criteria set forth below.
Employment-based:
� The principal applicant is employed by the same petitioner who submitted
the approved underlying employment-based visa petition.
� The principal applicant has been interviewed in the course of an
investigation or field examination, and the adjudicating examiner
determines that further interview of the applicant is unnecessary.
� The principal applicant has been approved as an alien of extraordinary
ability or alien of exceptional ability and is otherwise eligible for
adjustment of status.
� The principal applicant has been approved as an outstanding professor or
researcher, or a multinational executive/manager and has a continuing
offer of employment from the same petitioner who submitted the
underlying approved petition.
� Adjustment applicants who received national interest waivers based on
performing primary medical care to a medically under-served area must
demonstrate that they intend to continue according to the terms and
conditions of the underlying petition.
Other:
� Sufficient evidence is contained in the record to support a denial of the
adjustment of status application. For example, if an I-485 that should
have been rejected at Visa Screening/INS Review was accepted in error, a
denial would be processed by the adjudicating officer.
Employmentbased
Criteria
The adjudicating officer must determine whether the employment-based
I-485 meets waiver of interview criteria set forth below.
Employment-based:
� The principal applicant is employed by the same petitioner who submitted
the approved underlying employment-based visa petition.
� The principal applicant has been interviewed in the course of an
investigation or field examination, and the adjudicating examiner
determines that further interview of the applicant is unnecessary.
� The principal applicant has been approved as an alien of extraordinary
ability or alien of exceptional ability and is otherwise eligible for
adjustment of status.
� The principal applicant has been approved as an outstanding professor or
researcher, or a multinational executive/manager and has a continuing
offer of employment from the same petitioner who submitted the
underlying approved petition.
� Adjustment applicants who received national interest waivers based on
performing primary medical care to a medically under-served area must
demonstrate that they intend to continue according to the terms and
conditions of the underlying petition.
Other:
� Sufficient evidence is contained in the record to support a denial of the
adjustment of status application. For example, if an I-485 that should
have been rejected at Visa Screening/INS Review was accepted in error, a
denial would be processed by the adjudicating officer.
ronhira
10-07 02:50 PM
How will removing country limits help China, India and ROW.
Has someone done any calculations on visa date movement.
We should have some comparison on this because some of us from China against. I seen many ROW against.
Does it help only Indians or everyone by how much?
I see these calculations bringing Indians, Chinese and ROW together.
the truth is this.... some of the chinese are against removal of country limits becoz they do not care if it helps them..... they r simply opposed to removal of per country limits becoz they cannot see india getting any benefit..... its the age old chinese mindset which cannot be changed with numbers or calculations...... otherwise just think for u'rself...... if china is retrogressed as evident from monthly visa bulletin .... & removal of per country limits will create 1 queue for everyone..... then y would some of these chinese be opposed to the removal of per country limits.....
row is altogether a different discussion....
Has someone done any calculations on visa date movement.
We should have some comparison on this because some of us from China against. I seen many ROW against.
Does it help only Indians or everyone by how much?
I see these calculations bringing Indians, Chinese and ROW together.
the truth is this.... some of the chinese are against removal of country limits becoz they do not care if it helps them..... they r simply opposed to removal of per country limits becoz they cannot see india getting any benefit..... its the age old chinese mindset which cannot be changed with numbers or calculations...... otherwise just think for u'rself...... if china is retrogressed as evident from monthly visa bulletin .... & removal of per country limits will create 1 queue for everyone..... then y would some of these chinese be opposed to the removal of per country limits.....
row is altogether a different discussion....
2011 Bottom row: Cori Rist,
cloud 9
05-06 07:34 PM
I applied I-140 in June of 2007 and case was approved in Oct, 2007.
more...
RandyK
03-27 03:06 PM
Do both have to go for the visa interview?
Or can my wife go an get this ?
Or can my wife go an get this ?
hnordberg
June 25th, 2005, 12:19 PM
Yeah, the first one has a bit of haze that pulls down the saturation. The foreground is interesting and pretty. I would try bumping saturation and contrast in PS. And maybe increase the overall exposure.
Also, is there a reason that you cut off the left of the bridge? I probably would have tried a horizontal shot too.
Also, is there a reason that you cut off the left of the bridge? I probably would have tried a horizontal shot too.
more...
jonnotman
02-10 11:50 AM
Dear Fellow Posters
After 12 months of toil I have finally completed the narrative and evidence that I need for an EB-1a (Extraordinary Alien) application. I ab about to complete the I-140 paperwork to go with it.
My questions is this - I have contacted a small number of Immigration attorneys who have quoted me approx $6000 for the whole process. How many of you value think that USCIS would look at my application more favourably if I used a reputed attorney rathen than putting in my own application and paperwork ?
Thanks in anticpation of your replies
Jon
After 12 months of toil I have finally completed the narrative and evidence that I need for an EB-1a (Extraordinary Alien) application. I ab about to complete the I-140 paperwork to go with it.
My questions is this - I have contacted a small number of Immigration attorneys who have quoted me approx $6000 for the whole process. How many of you value think that USCIS would look at my application more favourably if I used a reputed attorney rathen than putting in my own application and paperwork ?
Thanks in anticpation of your replies
Jon
2010 Tiger Woods#39; mistresses - Mamma mia, Cori Rist!
senk1s
05-22 03:37 PM
1. If you renewed H1s from within the US...the I94 number should be the same
2. Check with an attorney - my attorney said, while AP is pending decision it is better not to travel
2. Check with an attorney - my attorney said, while AP is pending decision it is better not to travel
more...
mombemoo
June 19th, 2005, 05:06 AM
well after getting up at 4:30 here is the results... critiques welcomed!
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/511/medium/IMG_2877.jpg
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/511/medium/IMG_2877.jpg
hair Tiger Woods#39; mistresses - Mamma mia, Cori Rist!
Blog Feeds
12-22 02:30 PM
Dallas-Fort Worth Immigration Lawyer Has Just Posted the Following:
Effective January 4, 2010, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention (HHS/CDC) is removing HIV from the list of communicable diseases of public health significance and references to HIV from the scope of medical examinations for foreign nationals.
Until the rule goes into effect, non-citizens who are HIV-positive cannot be admitted into the U.S. unless the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) grants a waiver. Once the rule goes into effect on January 4, 2010, HIV infection will no longer be defined as a communicable disease of public health significance, immigrant visa applicants who are required to undergo a medical screening exam will no longer be tested for HIV, a waiver for entry into the U.S. will no longer be necessary, and HIV-positive visa applicants will not be found ineligible for visas under Section 212(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Although foreign nationals with HIV who apply for visas will no longer be ineligible under INA Section 212(a)(1)(A)(i), they still must overcome the public charge under INA Section 212(a)(4) by demonstrating to the consular officers that they will have the means of support in the U.S. and that they will not need to seek public financial assistance. Please visit CDC’s Web site (http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dq/laws_regs/fed_reg/remove-hiv/final-rule-hiv.htm) for more information.
More... (http://dfwimmigrationlaw.clarislaw.com/immigration-news/rule-change-on-cdc-list-of-communicable-diseases-of-public-health-significance.php)
Effective January 4, 2010, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention (HHS/CDC) is removing HIV from the list of communicable diseases of public health significance and references to HIV from the scope of medical examinations for foreign nationals.
Until the rule goes into effect, non-citizens who are HIV-positive cannot be admitted into the U.S. unless the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) grants a waiver. Once the rule goes into effect on January 4, 2010, HIV infection will no longer be defined as a communicable disease of public health significance, immigrant visa applicants who are required to undergo a medical screening exam will no longer be tested for HIV, a waiver for entry into the U.S. will no longer be necessary, and HIV-positive visa applicants will not be found ineligible for visas under Section 212(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Although foreign nationals with HIV who apply for visas will no longer be ineligible under INA Section 212(a)(1)(A)(i), they still must overcome the public charge under INA Section 212(a)(4) by demonstrating to the consular officers that they will have the means of support in the U.S. and that they will not need to seek public financial assistance. Please visit CDC’s Web site (http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dq/laws_regs/fed_reg/remove-hiv/final-rule-hiv.htm) for more information.
More... (http://dfwimmigrationlaw.clarislaw.com/immigration-news/rule-change-on-cdc-list-of-communicable-diseases-of-public-health-significance.php)
more...
conchshell
07-11 11:53 PM
I applied for the subscription, please approve my subscription
hot Tiger Woods#39; mistresses - Mamma mia, Cori Rist!
kol_rakesh
01-27 01:24 PM
hello
This is an icon describing the mood of the topic or describing information contained in the topic. For more info on icons, read our FAQ. posted January 25, 2008 11:27 AM Click Here to See the Profile for kol_rakeshClick Here to Email kol_rakesh Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Messagehello,
i applied for OPT in OCT no response from TSC for a long period ,contacted international officer--she emailed TSC got response no record of such case found.
i had to apply again in DEC they cashed my check for this one so got to know my receipt number.
so i cancelled check of first application as i thought that was missing.
but problem is they processed the application for cancelled check and sent my EAD too.
second application is withdrawn.
now, they came to know that check is cancelled
they put a status that fee payment rejected due to insufficient funds and ill receive a notice.
i waited for 2 weeks received a notice saying ill receive a INVOICE notice from INS dept in which i have to pay amount for that case.
NO INVOICE received and by the time i got my notice from uscis i called to INS they said u are a day late for payment--i said no invoice received so cant get back to you.
i had payed the debt -- but INS said i was a day late
it depends on uscis to decide............
1) now will my application get rejected
2) do i have any chances of refiling again (if rejected)
as i graduated in december my I-20 will expire for refiling .?
I plead moderators and users to reply me in this regard
reply's are appreciated
thankyou
rakesh
This is an icon describing the mood of the topic or describing information contained in the topic. For more info on icons, read our FAQ. posted January 25, 2008 11:27 AM Click Here to See the Profile for kol_rakeshClick Here to Email kol_rakesh Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Messagehello,
i applied for OPT in OCT no response from TSC for a long period ,contacted international officer--she emailed TSC got response no record of such case found.
i had to apply again in DEC they cashed my check for this one so got to know my receipt number.
so i cancelled check of first application as i thought that was missing.
but problem is they processed the application for cancelled check and sent my EAD too.
second application is withdrawn.
now, they came to know that check is cancelled
they put a status that fee payment rejected due to insufficient funds and ill receive a notice.
i waited for 2 weeks received a notice saying ill receive a INVOICE notice from INS dept in which i have to pay amount for that case.
NO INVOICE received and by the time i got my notice from uscis i called to INS they said u are a day late for payment--i said no invoice received so cant get back to you.
i had payed the debt -- but INS said i was a day late
it depends on uscis to decide............
1) now will my application get rejected
2) do i have any chances of refiling again (if rejected)
as i graduated in december my I-20 will expire for refiling .?
I plead moderators and users to reply me in this regard
reply's are appreciated
thankyou
rakesh
more...
house Who are the Tiger Wood#39;s
MetteBB
05-27 10:19 AM
That is GREAT news K *loving it
/mette
/mette
tattoo Cori Rist with presenter
aolujumu
02-25 01:37 PM
Welcome, i am also new to C#
I seems alike with C++ but the
variables are offcourse different and all that
I hope the program is flexible as well...
I seems alike with C++ but the
variables are offcourse different and all that
I hope the program is flexible as well...
more...
pictures Middle row - Cori Rist,
sanju
01-22 03:49 PM
the link you provided did not show any "Interestnig Cricket Widget on IV". Is that the correct link?
.
.
dresses Plans For Tiger Woods Designed
harrydr
09-11 11:52 PM
My understanding is in current times, you cannot file I-140 and I-485 concurrently. Did you file your I-140 and I-485 together in 2008?
more...
makeup Moquin and Cori Rist
akhilmahajan
05-24 07:49 AM
U r absolutely right........ i have heard ppl saying they are willing to transfer H-1B's but they say they wont process GC............. This is just un believable.......... I guess the whole idea is to recycle ppl after every 6 years..........
Hello,
Last 3-4 years after India and Chinese economy started booming I have seen that many Indian companies (Infy/wipro/pcs) do not apply for Green Cards for all thier US employees. They file GCs for KEY employees and marketing guys.
Most of the Software engineers work for 3,4,5 years and go back.
I recently read somewhere that Infy/wipro although applied for 20K H1 visas only applied for less than 100 GC last year.
Have you seen this trend?
Hello,
Last 3-4 years after India and Chinese economy started booming I have seen that many Indian companies (Infy/wipro/pcs) do not apply for Green Cards for all thier US employees. They file GCs for KEY employees and marketing guys.
Most of the Software engineers work for 3,4,5 years and go back.
I recently read somewhere that Infy/wipro although applied for 20K H1 visas only applied for less than 100 GC last year.
Have you seen this trend?
girlfriend Cori Rist
j751
06-19 01:11 PM
Does anyone have a I-140 recepit # starting with "WAC" and know which Service center their I-140 is pending?
Thanks...:)
Thanks...:)
hairstyles Cori Rist Becomes Latest to
annieo
10-17 08:37 PM
Hi Guys
I went to local USCIS office today and asked about my case status. My I-485 was filled on 08Feb07 in EB2 category. A lot of people who have fillled I-485 after me, have already received green cards.
The Immigration lady was very nice and she told me that my case can not be approved as my name check is still pending with FBI. The name check was initiated on 24Feb07. She created a service ticket for me providing a target date of middle of next month. The ticket said that "Please approve asap after getting clearance from FBI". I do not know what does that mean? Still trying to figure out???
Then I asked about name check status of my dependants. She mentioned that their name check has been resolved which is different from cleared. She created a different SR for my dependants requesting Approval of Green cards as name check has been resolved again giving me mid of next month as target date. Does it mean that my depandants can get approval before my approval?
Gurus Any idea what should I expect. Do I need to continue to follow up with FBI and senators regarding my name check and collecting information for case file?
Regards
AnnieO
I went to local USCIS office today and asked about my case status. My I-485 was filled on 08Feb07 in EB2 category. A lot of people who have fillled I-485 after me, have already received green cards.
The Immigration lady was very nice and she told me that my case can not be approved as my name check is still pending with FBI. The name check was initiated on 24Feb07. She created a service ticket for me providing a target date of middle of next month. The ticket said that "Please approve asap after getting clearance from FBI". I do not know what does that mean? Still trying to figure out???
Then I asked about name check status of my dependants. She mentioned that their name check has been resolved which is different from cleared. She created a different SR for my dependants requesting Approval of Green cards as name check has been resolved again giving me mid of next month as target date. Does it mean that my depandants can get approval before my approval?
Gurus Any idea what should I expect. Do I need to continue to follow up with FBI and senators regarding my name check and collecting information for case file?
Regards
AnnieO
immigration1234
02-20 10:31 AM
Hi,
My mom is scheduled for an interview for a visitor visa at US Consulate, Chennai. My mom is 70 years old and she will be the only person attending for the interview. She has not travelled a lot and she will not be able to figure out everything that is needed inside the consulate before and after the interview by herself. Now - my question is - Can my mom take anyone (say a relative) with her inside the consulate for help?
Appreciate your help!
My mom is scheduled for an interview for a visitor visa at US Consulate, Chennai. My mom is 70 years old and she will be the only person attending for the interview. She has not travelled a lot and she will not be able to figure out everything that is needed inside the consulate before and after the interview by herself. Now - my question is - Can my mom take anyone (say a relative) with her inside the consulate for help?
Appreciate your help!
rajeev_74
12-20 11:17 PM
Hi,
I was wondering if there is a limit on the # of travels for each AP approval. I received 2 AP documents valid until May 2010. I have already travelled twice. On my first return the immigration officer kept my AP document at POE (NY) but the 2nd time it was stamped & returned (Washington DC was POE) to me. I was wondering if I could use this document for subsequent re-entries or do I have to apply for a new AP.
Thanks,
Rajeev
I was wondering if there is a limit on the # of travels for each AP approval. I received 2 AP documents valid until May 2010. I have already travelled twice. On my first return the immigration officer kept my AP document at POE (NY) but the 2nd time it was stamped & returned (Washington DC was POE) to me. I was wondering if I could use this document for subsequent re-entries or do I have to apply for a new AP.
Thanks,
Rajeev
No comments:
Post a Comment